Guide to Polis

Welcome to a new kind of conversation! Polis is an interactive democratic platform used around the world to gather, understand and analyse what large groups of people think.

What is Polis?

Polis is an interactive inclusive and fair online polling tool that helps groups of people have conversations and make decisions together. It’s especially useful when you want to understand what a large group thinks about a given topic, as it gathers and curates opinions shared by participants.

What makes Polis special is that it allows for everyone involved in a conversation to have an equal chance to share their views; everyone is included. Also, it offers opportunities for extended conversations over days, weeks or even months, until consensus is reached.

This movement towards a consensus is helped by smart processes going on in the background; the algorithm presents those statements that more people agree with. As ideas are increasingly agreed with, they will show up more often to help take the exploration of a topic and the discussion forward. It can also identify different clusters of opinions too.

It helps us see what a whole community thinks, not just the loudest voices.

Polis doesn't allow back and forth arguments, so trolls are sidelined.

For a fuller explanation of the value of Polis, jump to our Benefits of Using Polis page.

Who Uses Polis?

Governments, cities, and organisations around the world use Polis to shape policies or decisions based on real input from the public. Taiwan is the poster child and worth exploring. (See case study below)

How We Use Polis in XR

Polis can be a stand-alone tool, or used in conjuction with assemblies. Using Polis can strengthen community assembly processes by harvesting the 'wisdom of the crowd'. It produces understandable statistical reports. As the analysis can be shared publicly at the end of a conversation, this process is transparent.

If you would like to take part in using this exciting new way of decision-making, or if you have any questions, or need support with XR's Polis tool, contact the UK Assemblies team.

Case Study - Polis in Taiwan

What happened? The government of Taiwan used Polis to help decide how to regulate Uber, which was a controversial issue. Taxi drivers, Uber drivers, government officials, and everyday citizens all had different opinions.

The problem: People strongly disagreed. Taxi drivers wanted protection, while Uber users wanted cheaper, safe and flexible rides. Traditional public meetings turned into shouting matches with no real progress.

How Polis helped: The then Digital Minister, Audrey Tang, invited the public to use Polis online. Thousands of people participated by voting on statements and adding their own ideas. Polis grouped people into clusters of opinion i.e. people who supported Uber vs people who didn’t.

Most importantly, it found shared values across those groups, such as:

The result: Polis helped the government find areas of agreement that everyone could live with. These ideas shaped new regulations that balanced safety, fairness, and innovation. Because people saw their voices reflected in the results, they were more willing to accept the final regulations.

This opened the door to Polis being used more widely by the Government in engaging the public in other policy decisions.

Why it Works in Taiwan and Elsewhere:

The government made decisions based on common ground, not just opinions from lobbyists or activists. People in Taiwan are now much more engaged in decision making about issues impacting their daily lives.

In this video [17 mins] Audrey Tang talks about how Polis was used to help pass laws with public inclusion.

Benefits of Using Polis

Introduction

Polis[1] is a powerful open-source platform for harnessing the wisdom of the crowd; this helps communities whether local, entire cities, states, or even countries find common ground on complex issues. It reveals hidden areas of agreement so decision-makers can find consensus and resolve tensions on divisive and complex issues.

Inclusive Participation

Polis is an interactive, simple to use online tool that helps groups of people have fair and inclusive conversations and make decisions together at scale and over extended periods[2]. Unlike standard polls, it involves people directly in the conversation by enabling them to contribute their own statements and ideas[5].

Extinction Rebellion UK hosts its own version of Polis on secure servers running on renewable energy in Switzerland.

What Makes Polis Special?
Video

Looking at Polis - a new tool hoping to reboot democracy and find common ground amongst even the most polarised views. 'Can Taiwan Reboot Democracy?' BBC Click [7mins 38secs]

Understanding Group Opinion at Scale

It is especially useful when you want to understand what a large group thinks about a certain topic[2]. Polis is particularly valuable when you need to understand who exactly believes what within a larger group; for instance, identifying opinion clusters among people with varying levels of experience or background[3].

Potential Outcomes
Transparency and Statistical Rigour

Polis produces understandable statistical reports, As the analysis can be shared publicly at the end of a conversation, this process is transparent.[2]. The most powerful part is that it highlights statements that different groups agree on, and where they disagree. Finding where people's opinions align makes for more legitimate decision making that everyone has been involved in. This gives legitimacy and weight to any Polis deliberation process, supporting more willing adoption of its conclusions by organisations and institutions.

Policy and Community Applications

Deeper Dive

Further info: Consensus Building in Taiwan, the Poster Child of Digital Democracy by Sebastian Cushing Rodriguez. Read this blog by James Sweetland: 'A sophisticated conversation about misinformation via Polis' [5].

Polis: Gamified Consensus Finding

Polis has been central to the success of vTaiwan. A topic is put up for debate and anyone with an account can comment and downvote or upvote other people’s comments. While this may appear similar to other participation tools or forums, there are several features that set Polis apart.

First is that Polis does not allow users to respond to other people’s comments, drastically reducing the risk of trolls disrupting the debate. Second, it turns the upvote and downvote feature into one that clusters people who vote similarly. A visualisation emerges highlighting where there are like-minded viewpoints and division.

As the debate begins, Polis draws a map showing all the different knots of agreement and dissent as they emerge. As views are expressed in greater numbers, the platform gives visibility to statements that find consensus not just among people within the same ideological bubble, but with those outside as well.

Polis in essence gamifies the process of finding consensus. It encourages users to propose and refine viewpoints to win greater support from all sides of a discussion. The greater the consensus around a viewpoint, the greater attention it gets.

As the avatars of each user cluster around specific viewpoints, the platform’s design hides divisive statements, provocation and trolling. The debates are spared the toxicity prevalent on other platforms, which so often fail to foster civil discourse.

Eventually, a group of consensual statements emerge. The final viewpoints may not appear like any of the ones made at the beginning of the discussion. The new consensus can then be turned into laws and regulations.

Summary

As a digital engagement platform, Polis offers a powerful framework for collective decision-making and community governance on a large scale.

Sources
  1. Pol.is en.wikipedia.org

  2. What is Polis? Rebel Toolkit

  3. Polis: Why and How to Use it by brook, Chana Messinger

  4. Polis and the Political Process by Harry Carr and Josh Smith in partnership with the Open Rights Group

  5. A sophisticated conversation about misinformation via Polis by James Sweetland

  6. How do we find consensus? YouTube (42secs)

Guide: Polis for Participants

How does Polis work?

Polis uses maths (algorithms) to see where people agree and disagree on issues. It groups people into clusters based on how they vote and not who they are. This helps set priorities fairly. If there are demographic statements, these help cluster groups based on specific characteristics, e.g. age, location, gender etc. Read the XR Polis privacy info here.

The most powerful part: Polis highlights statements that different groups agree on, and where they disagree. Learning where people's opinions align, allows for fairer and more acceptable decision making. More info on the history and use of Polis here.

Adding Your Own Statements

This is your chance to contribute new ideas to the poll for everyone else to vote on. Use clear and concise wording, limited to 140 characters. Your statement shouldn't be a question that requires anything more than a simple response! Remember, people will be replying with 'Agree', 'Disagree' or 'Pass / Unsure'.

What Happens Next

How Polis Respects Your Privacy

Moderation

There are trained dedicated Moderators for every Polis poll. They help keep the poll simple and ensure protection of privacy.

Sometimes participants add statements that have two options, in which case Moderators will reword this into two statements, both of which can be voted on. There may be repetition of ideas; Moderators will reject those statements that are too similar.

To view rejected statements and reasons why they've been rejected by Moderators, join the Polis Support broadcast on Telegram app.


If you have any questions or need support - contact the UK Assemblies Team.

Guide: Polis for Assembly Organisers

This guide is for anyone wanting to organise an assembly and use an interactive poll on Polis, or as a stand-alone 'sentiment check' on an important issue.

How to Organise and Use Polis

It can be difficult to get an accurate picture of people's opinions and feelings on sensitive or complex topics. Polis is a great tool for you to open conversations, first by seeding some initial facts or position statements into your poll. Secondly by allowing participants to vote on these and add their own, if they feel that important, relevant issues have been omitted.

People can then vote on these added statements; this ability to actively engage is the value of an interactive poll.

You will be supported by the UK Assemblies Team. You can request training on how to run a poll, how to frame your question, how to write good seed statements and how Polis works within an assembly.

Find more general information here on What is Polis?

Difference Between Polis Questions and Statements

Open questions are used as the topic for your Polis poll.
Statements are concisely expressed facts or perspectives for people to respond with either: 'AGREE' / 'DISAGREE' or 'PASS' / 'UNSURE'.

The Question

A good polling or assembly deliberation question or topic inspires, fires imaginations and invites all involved to participate in a spirit of hope, trust, openness, inclusion, creativity and empowerment.

There are no wrong and right answers to designing your Polis question, but it is important to be clear about your ultimate goal first. Then refine and distill the topic to serve your agreed purpose. Think about what will inspire feeling as well as ideas, because that will generate real enthusiasm for the process and can help generate energy for putting in place ideas generated!

How to Frame the Polis question

Begin with getting clear on the purpose of your poll and who is participating. How you frame it is important, because it sets parameters and keeps people focused.

Does your organising group want:
Consider who the issue is relevant to, is it...
Sense-checking

Co-creating with others will help you develop your question and statements for participants to vote on.

Example Question Openers

Example Questions

Open questions but with boundaries work well and open up discussions by inviting all voices to join in.

How can we nurture nature in (community / village / town, etc.) across the seasons?
This question sets a geographical limit, which will suggest solutions that can be implemented locally and offer a breakdown of recommendations based on different times of year. It may also suggest where there is a need for possible actions at a national or even international level.

How can (name of locality / town / county) make sure that everyone in our community can access healthy, affordable food for the long term?
Food resilience is a massive topic, with many threads, all of which could be addressed by expert or enthusiast groups coming together on specialist areas.

How might XR be more focused on its demand for systemic change - a Citizens’ Assembly on Climate and Ecological Justice?
This could be asked just for UK circle role holders and it could be narrowed down to what they could do within their curren role or team. Or it could be asked to whole movement to get wider ideas of what to do locally.

How might communication be improved between the UK Circles, Nations and Regions, Local, Campaign and Community groups?
A movement wide Polis on this could come up with new ideas and show where there was strong agreement.

Possibly too broad:

How can [locality: local, regional, national] do something about climate change together within the next year?
Being a broad question, it will involve a longer poll, with many more statements to vote on. However, Polis will automatically show which statements gain the most popularity to help prioritisation and point to possible connected issues.

How might we rely less on fossil fuels?
There are no timelines in this question, which broadens the scope. The locality may offer some limits to statements to vote on. This is potentially a huge topic, which will generate need for further deliberation.

Statements

Some examples (each statement cannot be more than 140 characters):

NOTE - always double check that someone can answer with 'AGREE' / 'DISAGREE' or 'PASS' / 'UNSURE'.

Moderation of Polis

Running an interactive Polis poll requires Moderators. The work closely with Assembly Organisers.

Moderators are needed to:

They moderate peoples' added ideas, e.g.:


If you have any questions or need support - contact the UK Assemblies Team.

Polis: In Depth

Deep Dive - Representative Balance

Spoiler alert! No system of democracy is perfect. However, anyone who takes part in an assembly, will mostly say how rewarding they find the experience and some local groups have gone onto holding multiple assemblies. However, sometimes the recording of peoples’ discussions can be difficult with the time constraints of community assemblies, that normally only have a few hours to work through what is a jam-packed process. Sometimes, facilitators and note-takers are fresh volunteers, which can create bias, mistakes and limitations. That together with assemblies not being part of our everyday culture means that despite best efforts, the recommendations or outputs of an informal assembly are not as good as they could be.

The key to people valuing this process is assemblies being as representative and inclusive of all views as possible. UK Assemblies will ensure that inputted statements for voting on in Polis are well-balanced and include as many participants and their views as possible.

The final decision on which statements remain for people to respond to rests with Assembly Organisers and Moderators who have been trained in fair moderation methods.

One of the three pillars of a community assembly is ‘Trust the Process’. We ask of all taking part that they trust Assembly Organisers and Moderators will be offering the best possible experience with their training, knowledge and skills.

Nuts And Bolt Ons

Inclusion, Privacy and Demographic Information Trade Offs

Automatic Curation of Ideas and Like-Minded Folk

Sharing

In summary then, Polis is allows us to bring our collective intelligence to bear, based on shared understanding of issues and enables us to deliberate at scale, in the tradition of nonviolent communication. It isn’t purely a polling tool, it’s more of an interactive ‘suggestion box’ helping us to get consensus around controversial or contentious questions we all face.