Skip to main content

Do's and don't s

Do say Don’t say Why?
Politics/ Political system Democracy/ Democratic Democracy has positive connotations for many people, whereas politics does not. The root cause of our problem is the system, not the politicians.
Who will do right by us Who will make the best decision "Best decision" makes us consider qualifications and competence - that decisions should be left to politicians and elites. "Who will do right by us" implies honesty, sincerity and who has our best interests at heart. Politicians can’t compete with the public as trust in politicians is so low.
We have a right and responsibility to contribute to decisions The public are shut out of decisions Many people say that the opportunity to vote, lobby your MP and stand for election are examples of how ordinary people take part in politics.
We, us The public/ they Don’t separate our interests and experiences from those of the public. We are the public!
People like us “People like us” is a sticky phrase that people recall.
Teachers, doctors, scientists, shopkeepers. People from different walks of life Specifying these groups of people reminds us that we already trust people from our communities with important decisions.
Like a jury ... we all have an equal chance of being selected / they mirror the population in terms of things like gender, race, age and class.jury. Random selection When talking about participatory processes (e.g. Citizens’ Assemblies), talking about random"Random selection tends to cue “randoms” i.e. odd, untrustworthy people. In comparison, a jury is relatively well understood and trusted by the public.
We all have an equal chance of being selectedCitizens' assemblies mirror the population in terms of things like gender, race, age and class.
Not representative / unrepresentative Not elected /elected/ unelected Emphasising the importance of being elected (e.g. in the House of Lords) can reduce support for (unelected) citizens being more involved in decision making. Furthermore it positively depicts politicians as “more democratic” in comparison, subtly reinforcing the legitimacy of the current electoral system that appointed them.
The system is...is
old fashionedfashioned/ / Victorian /Victorian/ needs updating / upgrading The system... is broken /broken/ democracy is broken / we need to fix democracy WePeople found that these audiences hadhave some pride in the UK's democratic history of the UK, especially compared to other countries.history. They don’t agree that democracy is broken and asneeds it’s not broken nor does it need to be fixed.fixing. However, they acknowledgeagree that there is plenty of room for improvement to make it fit for purpose in the 21st century. Talking about updating or upgrading also makes it clear that the system is designed by human beings and can be changed.
Real/deeper democracy/ democracy for the people by the people Democracy fit for purpose people don’t want to get rid of our system
Party based/ confrontational Participatory/deliberative democracy Keep the language simple and positive, don't get lost in jargon
Informed/honest conversation Discussion,Deliberation, Debate, Finding common ground Consultation
Listening to / Learning from each other
Brave, Courageous Radical